Shoup Remarks, GCP Critique Thread

Not sure what you mean by "fudging the time". There is no manipulation of the sentiment peak the week of 9/2 that I can see, and other random databases have shown significant precursors to 9/11 of 2 weeks or more.

As discussed with Ed and you at the time, I feel this paper shows clearly just the opposite of what you claim, and further supports the idea that something happened in the RNG network on 9/11. Looking at Fig 10 particularly, one can see a striking difference between 9/11 data and all other days. It is not at all "easy, post hoc, to locate such fluctuations", and there is no such to be found in the database as far as I know. And these deviations *did* happen on 9/11, not some other undistinguished day. I stand by my original analysis to the effect that the GCP RNGs behaved very unusually on that day, beginning 4 hours prior to the events and continuing for at least 8-12 hours thereafter. In the GotPsi hit rate data, we can see a big drop 2 weeks prior to and thru 9/11, and unusual correlations stretching over an entire year thereafter, see my AAAS paper Physics without causality.

-- Dick